The National Atmospheric Deposition Program’s (NADP) Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) benefits from the activities of both internal and external quality-assurance (QA) programs. The internal program operates within the NADP’s Program Office (PO) and within its contract laboratory. The external program is operated by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Branch of Quality Systems (USGS/BQS).
MDN samples are analyzed for total mercury (Hg) by the Mercury Analytical Laboratory (HAL) at Frontier Global Sciences, Inc.3 (Seattle, WA). The USGS MDN Inter-laboratory Comparison program quantifies variability and bias in MDN analyses for comparison with laboratories in USA, Canada and Europe. HAL’s analytical bias is -1 nanograms Hg per liter (ng /L), over the analytical range of 6 to 24 ng/L, relative to participating laboratories. HAL ranked fourth out of nine laboratories in interlaboratory variability. Results of a USGS Blind Audit program, which monitors HAL’s performance using double-blind QA samples (disguised as field samples), confirms this bias.
System Blank Program results indicate that average Hg contamination in MDN samples is less than the second percentile of field sample concentrations. Source(s) of this contamination have not yet been identified in the field or laboratory.
Analysis of MDN field data suggests that sample loss through evaporation can impact data quality. Preliminary results suggest that sample evaporation can reduce measured total Hg concentrations by as much as 50 percent.
Co-located sampler configurations at operating MDN sites are used to estimate overall variability in MDN data. Annual precipitation-weighted mean Hg concentrations have a statistically significant (a=0.05) measurement resolution of +2 ng Hg/L over the entire range of field concentrations.
Results from each of these programs are available on the USGS/BQS website. Without these programs, the quality of MDN data would be unknown, and potential environmental spatial and temporal patterns could not be discerned from measurement variability and bias. 3Firm or trade names mentioned herein are for identification purposes only and do not constitute endorsement by the U.S. government.