One of the anthropogenic sources of Hg in environments impacted by gold-mining activities is liquid Hg(0), widely used in South America to amalgam gold. Excess mercury is first separated from the amalgam, generally by hand pressing, and then released into the river, increasing total Hg concentrations in sediments in Bolivian gold-mining areas. In this study, Hg isotope signatures have been analyzed in sediments sampled in mine tailings, along an impacted river and compared with a pristine area both in the Bolivian Amazon (Beni River basin) and in French Guiana (Oyapock River basin).
In the Beni R. sediments from mine tailings, d202Hg=–0.33±0.14‰ and D201Hg=–0.02±0.05‰ (2SD, n=4) are very close to d202Hg=–0.37±0.09‰ and D201Hg=–0.07±0.03‰ (2SD, n=3) of liquid Hg(0) used by gold-miners. On the other hand, isotopic signatures of Beni R. sediments downstream gold-mining areas, d202Hg=–1.02±0.36‰ and D201Hg=–0.06±0.07‰ (2SD, n=7), are not significantly different from Mamore River sediments that are not impacted by gold-mining activities, d202Hg=–1.03±0.22‰ and D201Hg=–0.09±0.10‰ (2SD, n=11) with P=0.84 for d202Hg and P=0.19 for D201Hg (student t-test, n=18). These results confirm preliminary study made on the Beni R. basin by Maurice-Bourgoin et al. (2003) who estimated that 26 t Hg.year–1 transit this river by natural erosion and dilute the anthropogenic Hg inputs at the basin scale (67500 km2).
In the Oyapock R. basin (28620 km2), Hg isotopic signatures of sediments from gold-mining tributaries d202Hg=–0.46±0.09‰ and D201Hg=–0.41±0.05‰ (2SD, n=3) are significantly different to the ones of the upstream pristine river d202Hg=–1.85±0.30‰ and D201Hg=–0.56±0.05‰ (2SD, n=8) with P<0.001 (student t-test, n=11) for both d202Hg and D201Hg. The D201Hg difference can be explained by a liquid Hg(0) contamination due to gold-mining: a mix of natural Hg with D201Hg=–0.56‰ and anthropogenic Hg with D201Hg=–0.02‰ is obtained. Based on a D201Hg binary mixing model, gold-mining inputs represent 29% of the total Hg in contaminated sediments of the Oyapock R. basin. Obviously more data are needed to refine this first estimate.