Mercury is found in both organic and inorganic forms in the atmosphere, sediment and water bodies due to natural and anthropogenic sources. The WHO estimates that humans ingest 2.4ug organic mercury and 4.3ug inorganic mercury daily. Limited information is available on the uptake and accumulation of mercury in developing organisms, particularly as it relates to chemical form of the metal. To address this problem we utilized synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging in zebrafish, an increasingly well studied model vertebrate for investigating mechanisms of chemical toxicity. We were interested in mapping the localization of inorganic mercury in zebrafish in conjunction with a previous study by our group on the localization of organic mercury in zebrafish (Korbas et al. (2008)PNAS 105: 12108-12112).
Zebrafish larvae were exposed to one of four forms of mercury (methyl mercury chloride, methyl mercury L-cysteine, mercuric chloride, and mercury bis-L-cysteineate). Adjacent serial sections were utilized for synchrotron imaging and histological staining, respectively.
Significant variations in mercury accumulation were found in fish exposed to organic mercury compared to fish exposed to inorganic mercury. Larvae exposed to inorganic mercury exhibited accumulation in the kidneys and olfactory epithelium. However, only the fish exposed to organic mercury exhibited preferential accumulation in the lens epithelium, gut tube, and skeletal muscles. These variations demonstrate the importance of considering chemical form when considering the uptake and accumulation of mercury.
Ongoing research investigates the efficacy of chelating agents. Although dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and alpha lipoic acid (ALA) are not true chelators, both are currently used to treat mercury exposure. As DMSA and ALA are poorly optimized for this role they are not always effective and often cause a number of adverse effects.
A preliminary test involved exposing fish to methyl mercury L-cysteine or mercuric chloride followed by a short treatment with either ALA or DMSA. Our results indicate that neither ALA nor DMSA are proper cheltors. Eventually, we hope to test a custom chelator that can bind and excrete different forms of mercury more effectively.