Methylmercury-associated effects on the cardiovascular system have been documented though discrepancies exist. Most studied populations experience elevated methylmercury exposures. Further, few have investigated the impact of low-level elemental mercury exposure. This study explored the association between mercury exposure (methylmercury via hair and blood, elemental mercury via urine) and blood pressure measures using the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2006) and a cohort of dental professionals that experience background exposures to both mercury forms. Information on demographics, occupational practices, medical history, and fish consumption was collected from dental professionals recruited during the 2010 Michigan Dental Association (MDA) Annual Convention. Hair and urine samples were analyzed for mercury, and blood pressure (systolic, SBP; diastolic, DBP) was measured in the dental cohort (n=262). Hair mercury levels were available for female NHANES participants (n=1150), and urine and blood mercury, SBP and DBP were obtained from male (n=1377) and female (n=3932) NHANES subjects. Distribution of mercury in hair in the dental cohort (median, range: 0.28, 0.02-5.18 µg/g) and urine (0.63, 0.03-5.54 µg/L) correspond well with the NHANES data. Linear regression models adjusting for potential confounders (BMI, age, gender) in the MDA cohort revealed a significant positive association between DBP and hair mercury (ß (standard error, SE)=2.76 (1.17) mm Hg, p=0.02). An association of the same direction was observed between SBP and hair mercury, though this was not significant (ß (SE)=2.67 (1.68) mm Hg, p=0.11).Urine mercury results opposed hair mercury in many ways. Notably, elemental mercury exposure was associated with a significant SBP decrease driven by the male population (ß (SE) for males: -3.26 (1.23) mm Hg, p=0.01; for females: 0.71 (1.35) mm Hg, p=0.6). Linear regression modeling of the NHANES data revealed a positive relationship between total mercury in blood and DBP after adjusting for confounders (ß (SE)=0.14 (0.05), p<0.05). Urine mercury was inversely associated with SBP in both males and females, and the association was stronger in males (ß (SE): -1.17 (0.41) vs. -0.28 (0.1) mm Hg; p<0.01). Overall, this study found associations between blood pressure and two forms of mercury in two cohorts at exposure levels relevant to the general population. These relationships varied according to gender and type of mercury exposure.